undefined>>11101337
>I'm genuinely curious and want to understand it
>is it some version of soft dom/bondage? or am I entirely missing the point?
Here is my take on it, as a long-lasting lover of tickling torture:
1. It's a torture that theoretically does not inflict pain or injuries (more on that later). For example, I like slightly sadistic things, but I do not like people being hurt or injured (so, spanking for me is okay, but putting a needle in someone's thigh turns me off).
2. The second thing is that it falls within the "forced pleasure" domain of activities. I would cluster it together with forced sitting on a sybian, etc.
3. However, there is a twist: it does *not* necessarily entail touching the primary sexual organs (i.e., clitoris) or even some secondary elements like nipples. This is wild to me and engenders the possibility of a "sexual pleasure beyond the standard biological outlets of sexual pleasure". And this is heaven. The idea of orgasming out of something that is not supposed to be related to penetrative sex, standard masturbation, or fertility. That is magic.
4. Finally, take into account that it is a great way to "fry" someone's brain and have this person lose control about herself. She might pee on herself, she might lose her mind and control over other bodily functions. For example, some people love hypnosis. I do not like it. I want my subject to be fully aware of every single minute of her demise, until (ideally speaking) things become almost irreversible. So, this practice has the great benefit of acting on conscious beings.

On a side note, I heard there might be some side effects, some of them noxious, if practiced in real life. But I have never gone to that point with my partners. If you know something more scientific on that, please tell. I am curious.

Post Nuke Tickling Thread

Post tickling right now that the boards got nuked please or I will die

< Go back