>i am not mad>>8195532
no, you don't get to pass the ball. you started this by saying it's Mom NTR to include the dad. Shut up, no it isn't
Netori =/= Netorare>>8195539
cuckshit is cuckshit, Cuckobor
netori, netorare, netorase
makes no difference>>8195548
Well whatever, we know momcest in about cucking so it's okay. As long as it stays in this thread you can call it whatever you likeLmao you cant even fucking proofread your own bait>>8195565
missed an apostrophe there retard>>8195539
I assume you mean this post >>8186174? That's literally a tourist who even announced that he was a tourist asking a question. Including the dad is not Mom NTR, but it's not unreasonable to dislike cheating, especially when it's not necessary for a fetish to work, like with momcest unless we use your out of touch definition where even widows are cheating.
It's perfectly reasonable and in line with reality to not mention the dad when he is not in the picture, just as it's possible that he does get mentioned even when he is dead.
However judging by your behavior it sounds like a focus on the dad is like 90% of the appeal to you, while most people reasonably expect momcest to focus on two things: incest with the mother.
I personally don't mind cheating, but I think it gets too faggy when they keep talking about him during sex or too dumb when the focus is about hurting the dad instead of the love between mother and son. Though I also don't mind when the dad is not mentioned once. After all I'm here for momcest while you are a faggot who is here for the dad.>>8195568
ackshually he didnt>>8195575
You as a royal you, as in your side, you tried to pass the ball to me even though it's you guys who can't stop crying over this

Widows aren't cheating, they're being stolen away. Because they are. How is this hard for you to understand?
And then you go off on your faggot rant cause you got nothing. You almost try to make a real argument, but then it just falls apart.

>>8195576
stop being retarded, your IQ is literally room temperature. at least the other guy actually tries to argue>>8195575
>It's perfectly reasonable and in line with reality to not mention the dad when he is not in the picture, just as it's possible that he does get mentioned even when he is dead.
The whole reason why he's not in the picture is so that you're free to have sex with mom. It's a contrivance. The mom will still feel turmoil over it and think about the triangle. A good writer will depict that, a bad one won't>>8195581
you're the retard spamming the update button hoping for a reply to your terrible bait while you sit on your fat ass huffing putrid breath in anticipation for the next reply you'll get but you were too stupid to check for typos in a rush to shit out your next terrible bait>>8195597
>you made typo!
no one gives a shit, fuck off weirdo>>8195600
not very smart of you>>8195599
yes you did make typo
your whole argument in now invalid because you were too stupid to check for typos and errors>>8195581
>>8195595
>You as a royal you, as in your side, you tried to pass the ball to me even though it's you guys who can't stop crying over this
In the very beginning, you could've just left it at Netori =/= Netorare, but instead you start whining about vanilla.
>Widows aren't cheating, they're being stolen away. Because they are. How is this hard for you to understand?
Throughout your posts you said that mom cheating or widowed mom sleeping with her son is basically the same thing to you >>8195006
>The mom will still feel turmoil over it and think about the triangle
It's possible yes. It's also possible and perfectly reasonable that she feels no turmoil. It's also possible that she does feel turmoil but doesn't constantly talk about it making it a huge part of the story or especially the sex scenes. For a widow, being single depends on her mindset, either she moved on or not. However you are obsessed with a focus on the dad and everything that doesn't, is contrivance to you when in reality you are just a faggot who needs every story to keep mentioning men all of the time.
And then you go off on your mental gymnastics cause you fried your brain with porn. You almost try to make a real argument, but then you keep falling back to the fact that you need a focus on men to get hard.>>8195605
I deleted my post because i lost track of who is arguing who
Anyway, everyone knows the retard baiting about momcest being about cucking the dad is just some seething retard whos been having a meltdown baiting since that tourist post
Whether that's (You) or the other anon, i dont care anymore.>>8195608
>you said bad about vanilla
Yeah feels bad doesn't it? Maybe you should just accept all momcest. Tell your friend to go fuck himself since I know you already said you don't mind cheating. It's just him who's still being an idiot
>It's also possible and perfectly reasonable that she feels no turmoil.
Wait, no turmoil? A mother? From having incest? But you're the one who said my brain is fried because I think "incest" is boring. Now you're saying the mom thinks incest is boring. Is the mom's brain fried?
That's what you're saying
The mom will naturally feel guilt, hatred, confusion, sadness, shame, lust, everything. If she doesn't or she keeps it to herself than you're dealing with a terrible story. That's all. Also all momcest is good, and you seem to think that too, so I don't know why you keep trying to win and "gotcha" me, repeating what I say is not very clever or witty
>>8195610
Oh I know why you deleted it
Cause your IQ is an IGN score>>8195624
>Wait, no turmoil? A mother? From having incest?
My bad, I overestimated you. Given the context it should be obvious that I was talking about turmoil regarding a betrayal of the deceased dad or however you want to call it, but it looks like your brain is just too cooked. Incest isn't boring, it's great, even by itself. Guilt, confusion, sadness, shame, lust, are all possible emotions one can include that can make it exciting, even without mentioning the dad once. I mentioned some things that I dislike, mostly when the focus shifts too much from mother and son to other things, a focus on intentionally hurting the dad is a frequent contender for example.>>8195645
>intentionally hurting the dad
there's no story like this. you're making up imaginary stuff that doesn't exist
there's like no momcest where you see the dad upset by what happened, much less one where he's upset and the mom-son are like 'yeaaah, get fucked'>>8195774
There are stories where they're drugging the dad or getting him drunk just to fuck next to him. Stuff like that for example.>>8195774
>there's like no momcest where you see the dad upset by what happened
yes there is
horsetail is the most known one

previus

next

Momcest

Previous: >>8145072

< Go back