>>18732331
>There is nothing that resembles Neoplatonism in the gospels
John literally calls Jesus the Logos in his gospel.
>and all of the Church Fathers were contemporary with Hellenization of the Levant and the heyday of Neoplatonism
>We for sure know they didn't, though. There is nothing that resembles Neoplatonism in the gospels
do you think Church Fthers means the apostles? The Church Fathers are not the Apostles, anon.
The Church Fathers are the likes of Ignatius of Antioch, Justin Martyr, Irenaus, Clement of Alexandria, Origen etc. i.e. the disciples of the disciples and their disciples, the immediate succesors to the apostolic era. You literally don't know what you are talking about because you are simply ignorant of the bulk of early Christian history or at least it seems that way.
I am not even saying this to be insulting but to help you understand.

You can read all of the early church writings and the works of the Church Fathers here if you want https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/churchfathers.html

the Neoplatonism is clearly there and that is even before Psuedo-Dionysius, it is nowehere near as much of a bombshell/killshot point as you think it in refuting Christianity