>>2684592

>It is, yes, because "allies" of gay folk have always betrayed them by being better at ideology. Gay men are self-hating and have a hard time believing in romantic gay couples since role models are scarce and social pressure to be conformist is so high.

Yes, 'romantic' and 'monogamous' gay couples are few and far between, but that's due to social persecution and pressure. Thus all the 'online persception' that OP see is 'only on sex'. But really, even if you look at hetero models: porn, divorce rates, celebrity relationships, etc. are the statistics really that good?

>This allows trannies, pedos, sex perverts, naturists, swingers and all other kinds of liars to claim ownership of the gay movement. Gen Z in the West is actually so bad at being gay that they would spout nonsense such that it is fine to be in a non-monogamous relationship while still claiming to fight for the rights of gay people to have children.

This is the stupidest thing I have seen. No body 'owns the gay movement'. You, as an adult, are entirely capable of establishing your own boundaries and pursue the relationship that YOU want. Even when you are living in a homophobic or otherwise repessive situation. Other than that, leave other people alone, hetero, homo, trans, asexual, or otherwise (except for illegal predatory and abusive ones).

/hm/ - Handsome Men

[SAUCE] FIND YOUR LOST PHOTOS/VIDEOS

Right wing/White Nationalist men

Huge uncut white cocks

Blond/Aryan Men

filipinos

Fags Legs Up

Perfect dickpics

Boypussy Thread

Exposed Men v2

BBC Thread #12