>>22029843

I don't even know where to begin with your assumptions.
>aggression
I wasn't aggressive, merely stated that i "hate this type of bullshit". Maybe i should have said i "dislike this (type of) nonsense" instead? Also, where I'm from, people incorporate explicit language into their daily speech to emphasize certain points; it has nothing to do with "aggression".
>sexual focus
We're on an imageboard dedicated to porn, Sherlock. Everyone who is here has a focus that is sexually related to some degree, not least of all the WOMEN who have, y'know, gotten their physical features cosmetically enhanced in order to maximize sex appeal.
>aversion to stagnancy/attraction to risk
Not even sure where you got this. Though not necessarily proud to do so, i nevertheless don't mind admitting my lifestyle is pretty risk-free, nor do i have any secret desire to change this.

In your short post, you have displayed a very surface level perspective and reduced both genders to attributes shared by both and exclusive to neither, as well as ignoring the essence of my initial post and subsequent reply in favor of personal sanctimony.

If you find wonder in everyday tasks then good for you, but i am not merely "falling for the meme"; it goes back further than that and i refuse to deny my desire exists just because it is physically impossible.

Desiring something, or in this case the desire to BE something, if easily obtained is not an issue. You simply obtain or become the thing you desire and move on, there is no reason for it to be an issue of debate or source of anguish. Only when that same thing is out of reach does it become as such and, in instances where, over a long enough period of time the desire remains unfulfilled does the seeker settle for an approximation or where this, too, is impossible and convince themselves that they never wanted it in the first place.

next

complete bimbo

< Go back