←Back to Wikihumanoid_vulva
📅 Updated:2026-01-16
🕒 Created:2025-06-11
🆔 ID:74870
Description
Tagging guidelines
A good way to look about vulva identification is that a form will either be an animal vulva, a humanoid vulva, or unusual vulva. The latter category might overlap with the other categories. Animal anatomy
- The anatomy should not match the criteria for a cloaca, or genital slit.
- Be suspicious of orifices that look like flat slits on non-mammal species.
- If the anatomy is consistent with another species, use the animal vulva tag for that species instead. Certain species have vulva with humanoid traits.
- A vulva that appears like a coin-slot is more likely (but not always) to be an animal vulva, than a humanoid one.
Defining traits
- Obviously if the body is that of a human, or humanoid, the genitalia (not always) is likely to be humanoid as well.
- Look for a visible humanoid labia majora (outer labia), or labia minora (inner labia). The labia minora doesn't need to be visible. See innie_vulva
- Without reason to conclude otherwise, the base assertion is that humanoid labia belongs to a humanoid vulva, especially if it has a plump appearance.
- Cloaca and genital slits sometimes appear plump, but should not be tagged as plump_labia.
- Do not expect the anatomy to look completely accurate. Artistic liberty can change the form in a way that differs from what the anatomy should look like, and that is fine.
Vulva anatomy
General appearance
The appearance of a pubic mound is also highly associative with a character that has a humanoid vulva. Posing examples
Related tags
Not to be confused with